[DOCS] Update sort examples to avoid using _id field #11202
Conversation
marcusvx
requested review from
AMoo-Miki,
dlvenable,
epugh,
kolchfa-aws,
natebower and
sumobrian
as code owners
|
Thank you for submitting your PR. The PR states are In progress (or Draft) -> Tech review -> Doc review -> Editorial review -> Merged. Before you submit your PR for doc review, make sure the content is technically accurate. If you need help finding a tech reviewer, tag a maintainer. When you're ready for doc review, tag the assignee of this PR. The doc reviewer may push edits to the PR directly or leave comments and editorial suggestions for you to address (let us know in a comment if you have a preference). The doc reviewer will arrange for an editorial review. |
marcusvx
force-pushed
the
update-sort-examples
branch
from
8a7fd44 to
066f0fd
Compare
Updates sorting documentation to avoid using the _id field in examples and adds a note linking to the ID field type documentation where the limitations are explained in detail. Improves consistency with other documentation pages and best practices. Signed-off-by: Marcus V. Ximenes <[email protected]>
marcusvx
force-pushed
the
update-sort-examples
branch
from
26931aa to
b77a339
Compare
|
When working with OpenSearch, I encountered significant performance issues caused by sorting operations using the _id field. While investigating the root cause, I discovered this is a known limitation that wasn't clearly documented in the sorting examples. |
|
Thanks, @marcusvx! @jainankitk Could you review this PR please? |
2 participants
Description
Updates sorting documentation to avoid using the _id field in examples and adds a note linking to the ID field type documentation where the limitations are explained in detail. Improves consistency with other documentation pages and best practices.
Version
all
Checklist
For more information on following Developer Certificate of Origin and signing off your commits, please check here.